UFWDA Community Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 30, 2014, 02:12:13 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Due to spammers, registration via this forum is on hold. Sorry for the inconvenience. 
We are however happy to manually add you, so please email us at forums@ufwda.org
Admin Team
14,013 Posts in 3,224 Topics by 971 Members
Latest Member: onejsmith
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
UFWDA Community Forum  |  Access (Land Use, RTF, Advocacy, etc)  |  General Land Advocacy  |  Topic: PNWRS-NEWS-RELEASE: Reliance on unverifiable observations hinders successful con « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: PNWRS-NEWS-RELEASE: Reliance on unverifiable observations hinders successful con  (Read 479 times)
Todd Ockert
ghost

Offline Offline

Posts: 1,793



WWW
« on: June 23, 2008, 12:16:25 pm »

U.S. Forest Service
Pacific Northwest Research Station  *  Rocky Mountain Research Station News and Information

Sources                              Media Assistance
Keith Aubry, (360) 753-7685          Yasmeen Sands, (206) 732-7823
kaubry@fs.fed.us                     ysands@fs.fed.us

Kevin McKelvey, (406) 542-4163       Dave Tippets, (970) 295-5930
kmckelvey@fs.fed.us                  dtippets@fs.fed.us

 Reliance on unverifiable observations hinders successful conservation of
                      rare, elusive wildlife species

PORTLAND, Ore. and FORT COLLINS, Colo. June 23, 2008. Nearly any evidence of the occurrence of a rare or elusive wildlife species has the tendency to generate a stir. Case in point: in February 2008, remote cameras unexpectedly captured the images of a wolverine in the central Sierra Nevada, an area from which the species was believed to be extinct since 1922. But frustratingly few observations prove to be so conclusive. So what, then, are managers to make of unverifiable observations, especially those that are not diagnostic?

Researchers from the U.S. Forest Service’s Pacific Northwest and Rocky Mountain Research Stations examined three cases of biological misunderstandings in which unverifiable, anecdotal observations were accepted as empirical evidence. Ultimately, they found that this acceptance adversely affected conservation goals for the fisher in the Pacific states, the wolverine in California, and the ivory-billed woodpecker in the southeast by vastly overestimating their range and abundance. The researchers’ findings appear in the current issue of the journal BioScience.

“These cases revealed that anecdotal data can be important to conservation by supplying preliminary data, such as early warnings of population declines,” said Kevin McKelvey, a research ecologist based in Missoula, Mont., and the study’s lead investigator, “but conclusions regarding the presence of rare or elusive species must be based on verifiable physical evidence.”

In their study, the researchers found that the dependability of species occurrence data depends on both the intrinsic reliability of each record as well as the rarity of the species in question, because the proportion of false positives increases as a species becomes rarer. To help managers determine the suitability of evidence in conservation decisionmaking, the researchers developed a gradient of evidentiary standards for data that increases in rigor along with species’ rarity. This “sliding scale” of standards might permit the use of anecdotal data, the least reliable form, in decisionmaking when the species in question is common, for example, but require indisputable physical evidence for a species thought to be extinct.
The authors also encourage professional societies to debate evidentiary standards for their organisms of interest and to establish rules for using occurrence data.

 “Over the years, many state and federal management agencies have placed a lot of emphasis on compiling sighting reports and other unverifiable wildlife observations” said Keith Aubry, a research wildlife biologist based in Olympia, Wash., and one of the study’s co-investigators.
“Unfortunately, the uncritical use of such observations has largely impeded conservation goals, not advanced them.”

The Pacific Northwest (PNW) and Rocky Mountain Research Stations are two of seven research facilities of the U.S. Forest Service. PNW Research Station is headquartered in Portland, Ore., and has 11 laboratories and centers located in the Pacific Northwest and about 500 employees. Rocky Mountain Research Station is headquartered in Fort Collins, Colo., and has 14 laboratories and centers in the Interior West and about 500 employees.

Article citation: McKelvey, Kevin S.; Aubry, Keith B.; and Schwartz, Michael K. (2008). Using anecdotal occurrence data for rare or elusive
species: the illusion of reality and a call for evidentiary standards.
BioScience. 58(6): 549-555. The article is available online at http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1641%2FB580611.

Logged

UFWDA Member #14102
Member of Cal4Wheel, Hanford Trail Busters, Rubicon 4WDA
www.accessarmy.com
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
UFWDA Community Forum  |  Access (Land Use, RTF, Advocacy, etc)  |  General Land Advocacy  |  Topic: PNWRS-NEWS-RELEASE: Reliance on unverifiable observations hinders successful con « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!