Author Topic: Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest-NOI to prepare an EIS.  (Read 1250 times)

Offline Todd Ockert

  • ghost
  • Posts: 1,797
    • Access Army
Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest-NOI to prepare an EIS.
« on: January 24, 2009, 02:05:03 pm »
[Federal Register: January 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 15)]
[Page 4368-4369]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access []

                                                Federal Register

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.


[[Page 4368]]


Forest Service

Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, WI; Twin Ghost Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.


SUMMARY: The Great Divide Ranger District intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to disclose the environmental
consequences of managing vegetation and the transportation system
within the Twin Ghost Project area. The approximate legal description
for the area is as follows: Township 42 North Ranges 4 and 5 West, and
Township 43 North Ranges 4, 5, and 6 West. The project area encompasses
approximately 67,085 acres in the west central portion of the Great
Divide Ranger District, within Ashland, Bayfield, and Sawyer counties
in Wisconsin. Excluding private in-holdings and lakes, there are about
53,427 acres of federal land within the project area, of which about
12,000 acres are proposed for vegetation management activities. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for details regarding the purpose and
need and proposed action.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received
by February 12th, 2009 to receive timely consideration. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected in May 2009 and the final
environmental impact statement is expected in October 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to District Ranger Constance Chaney,
Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Great Divide Ranger District, P.O.
Box 896, 10650 Nyman Avenue, Hayward, WI 54843. Comments may also be
sent via facsimile to 715-634-3769.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Proctor, Project Leader; Great
Divide Ranger District, P.O. Box 896, 10650 Nyman Avenue, Hayward, WI
54843, 715-634-4821.


Purpose and Need for Action

    The vegetation proposal is to use timber harvest as a means to
achieve forest health, silvicultural, and wildlife habitat improvement
goals set forth in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest 2004 Land
and Resource Management Plan. The transportation system proposal is
based on a risk/value assessment that was conducted with a goal to
provide ample public and administrative motorized access while
preventing undesirable natural resource impacts. The overall goal is to
balance the needs of the public with the protection of the natural
resources we all value.
    Many of the stands within the project area are experiencing
individual tree mortality and decreased growth rates due to their age,
drought stress, insect and disease outbreaks, overstocking, and other
factors. Many of the stands of short-lived forest types (aspen, balsam
fir, paper birch, and jack pine) are beyond rotation age. These stands
will experience increasing losses to decay and breakage, and be subject
to greater tree mortality, if they are not treated soon. Wildlife
species that are dependent upon early successional species such as
aspen for food and cover benefit from the maintenance of aspen on the
landscape that has a well-balanced age class distribution. Young aspen
is needed for foraging, breeding, and protective nesting and brood
cover. There are currently very few stands younger than 20 years. Many
of the long-lived stands (oak, red pine, white pine, and northern
hardwoods) are too crowded resulting in a decline of individual tree
growth and greater susceptibility to insects and disease. Other needs
that have been identified include: Increasing the amount of habitat for
spruce grouse, reducing ladder fuels in Wildland Urban Interface areas,
providing forest commodities, and providing a safe, efficient, and
effective transportation system.

Proposed Action

    The following proposed actions have been identified to address the
needs listed above: Thin 1,425 acres of red oak, 3,008 acres of
northern hardwood, 536 acres of red pine plantations, 218 acres of
white pine plantations, 30 acres of aspen, and 34 acres of balsam fir;
conduct a selection harvest in 1,973 acres of northern hardwoods;
shelterwood harvest 326 acres of oak, 1,106 acres of paper birch, and
17 acres of balsam fir; clearcut and regenerate 1,847 acres of aspen,
491 acres of jack pine, and 169 acres of red pine; underplant up to 313
acres of white pine and 157 acres of black spruce or jack pine; plant
169 acres of red pine and 162 acres of jack pine; prescribe burn up to
1,298 acres of oak, paper birch, or jack pine sites for regeneration;
mechanically scarify up to 1,780 acres of stands for regeneration;
remove balsam fir trees less than 3 inches in diameter in up to 3,000
acres of Wildland Urban Interface areas; maintain 187 miles of existing
roads; add to the system and maintain as open 57 miles of unauthorized
roads; add to the system and maintain as closed 37 miles of
unauthorized roads; construct 14 miles of temporary roads that would be
decommissioned after use for accessing stands that need treatment
infrequently; reconstruct 2 miles of road; convert 5 miles of road to
trail; close 11 miles of road year-round; seasonally close 6 miles of
road; and decommission 83 miles of predominantly unauthorized roads.

Responsible Official

    The responsible official for this project is District Ranger
Constance Chaney, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Great Divide
Ranger District, P.O. Box 896, 10650 Nyman Avenue, Hayward, WI 54843.

Scoping Process

    The Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest began the scoping process
for this project in October 2008, when it was listed on the
Chequamegon-Nicolet Schedule of Proposed Actions. In November 2008,
individuals, organizations, and agencies on the District's mailing list
and those owning property nearby the project area were sent information
packages and project information was posted on the Forest's Web site.
Since that time meetings have been held when requested by individuals,
organizations, and other agencies; news releases published in
newspapers of record; and information shared on Wisconsin Public Radio

[[Page 4369]]

other radio stations. An open house is planned to occur in early
February and additional meetings and open houses will be provided if
there is interest from the public. Project information is available on
the Internet at Click on ``Project
Proposals and Decisions'', then ``Twin Ghost Project''.

Preliminary Issues

    The following issues will be analyzed in the EIS: Effects of the
proposed activities on forest sustainability, soil productivity, water
and air quality, Regional Forester Sensitive Species (plants and
wildlife), game and non-game wildlife and bird species, non-native
invasive species, recreation and visuals.

Possible Alternatives

    Two alternatives to the proposed action are being developed in
response to public comments received. One alternative would consider
different types and amounts of silvicultural treatments to achieve the
vegetation related purpose and need objectives. The other would provide
a higher level of motorized access opportunities.

Comment Requested

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.

Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review

    A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
    The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, it is
important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of the
environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided
prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate
the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of timely and
specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review. Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until
after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
    Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.

(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22, 36 CFR 220.5(b) and Forest
Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21)

    Dated: January 16, 2009.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9-1601 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]


UFWDA Member #14102
Member of Cal4Wheel, Hanford Trail Busters, Rubicon 4WDA