UFWDA Community Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 29, 2014, 04:46:37 am

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Due to spammers, registration via this forum is on hold. Sorry for the inconvenience. 
We are however happy to manually add you, so please email us at forums@ufwda.org
Admin Team
14,064 Posts in 3,267 Topics by 973 Members
Latest Member: lizwirgau
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
UFWDA Community Forum  |  Access (Land Use, RTF, Advocacy, etc)  |  General Land Advocacy  |  Topic: Colorado Illegal Rd Closure Update « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Colorado Illegal Rd Closure Update  (Read 4937 times)
Dan Wagman
ghost

Offline Offline

Posts: 70


« Reply #30 on: January 29, 2010, 01:48:19 pm »

Please find the latest article on Congressman Lambornís ineffectiveness at the following link. This appeared in the Colo. Spgs. Independent on Thursday.

Media, please note that I am available for comment.

http://www.bodyintellect.com/forest_service/csi_lamborn_1-28-10.jpg 
Logged
Pat Brower
Great Lakes Four Wheel Drive Association
ghost

Offline Offline

Posts: 249



« Reply #31 on: January 31, 2010, 07:43:12 pm »

Nice job!
Logged

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Dan Wagman
ghost

Offline Offline

Posts: 70


« Reply #32 on: March 30, 2010, 05:52:08 pm »

Please note that the last public meeting for the South Rampart Travel Management Plan (TMP) took place earlier this month. You have until April 12 to submit your comments. The FS did a very good job of making information available for your review, such as comparison maps, comment forms, the presentation itself, etc. You may find everything you need here: http://southrampart.net/

What I find particularly interesting is that the proposed changes as seen in Alternative B and C (Alternative A is the current situation) do not match. Put another way, in Alternative B FSR 322A is supposed to be reopened yet in Alternative C it is supposed to be categorized as an Administrative trail. This is important because the TMP must be based on science, according to federal law (see 36 CFR 212 for more). So if the science indicates that a trail must be closed, it would seem that this should be so in both Alternatives. Unless, of course, the decision was NOT based on science, in which case it would appear to be arbitrary and capricious. This is the sort of thing the law does not like and would provide us with strong grounds for appeal. Please note that this situation applies to several roads, not just FSR 322A. 
Logged
Jim Mazzola
UFWDA President
ghost

Offline Offline

Posts: 166


« Reply #33 on: April 01, 2010, 06:18:36 pm »

Thanks for keeping us updated on this issue Dan
jim-kb8ymf
PR Director - UFWDA
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Up Print 
UFWDA Community Forum  |  Access (Land Use, RTF, Advocacy, etc)  |  General Land Advocacy  |  Topic: Colorado Illegal Rd Closure Update « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!