UFWDA Community Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 23, 2014, 06:28:00 am

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Due to spammers, registration via this forum is on hold. Sorry for the inconvenience. 
We are however happy to manually add you, so please email us at forums@ufwda.org
Admin Team
13,953 Posts in 3,174 Topics by 970 Members
Latest Member: Mactron
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
UFWDA Community Forum  |  Regional Focus - News and Local Events  |  Northeast  |  Topic: Comments to NPS @ Cape Hatteras National Seashore ORV PROPOSED RULE (RIN 1024-A « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Comments to NPS @ Cape Hatteras National Seashore ORV PROPOSED RULE (RIN 1024-A  (Read 914 times)
Peter Vahry
UFWDA International Vice-President

Offline Offline

Posts: 1,265



« on: August 10, 2011, 09:54:38 pm »

Comments to NPS @ Cape Hatteras National Seashore

ORV PROPOSED RULE (RIN 1024-AD85)

The public comment period is opened to receive your comments on the proposed ORV RULE (36 CFR Part 7 – SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM, paragraph 7.58 Cape Hatteras National Seashore). The proposed regulation is available at the following sites; www.parkplanning.nps.gov/documentslist.CFM?projectID=10641, www.islandfreepress.org, www.NCBBA.org, www.obpa.org, www.preservebeachaccess.org, and multiple blogs and websites.

This summarily written document is less than 3 pages (excluding the introduction, definitions and questions & answers). The NPS document spells out rules for ORV Operations and ORV Routes and Areas, therefore your comments should be directed to the document as written and/or that which you believe has been left out or ignored. Comments should propose specific solutions where at all possible.

NCBBA suggests that upon reading this document, you note those parts most objectionable to you and your response should be written accordingly.  We will not publish a form letter since this type of response will be ignored by the NPS/DOI readers.

Some of the more obviously objectionable items included in the “Proposed Rule” are:

(c) (2) ORV Permits., While we will not support permits/fees, if they are instituted by the superintendent, he   should limit their cost to a minimal amount that could be readily afforded by the average citizen. A visitor to this Seashore should not have to consider the cost of a permit when budgeting his/her family vacation. The $150-$200+ permit costs @ some seashores is uncalled for in this Recreational Area.   Any permit should be readily available on the internet, the NPS could not possibly process the volume of visitors arriving on a sunny Saturday in mid-summer thus creating unintended closures .

(c) (7) Special use permits…. (iii) Transportation of mobility impaired individuals; We appreciate a permit             being made available but to immediately remove the vehicle presents a safety issue for the impaired             person. The driver must be allowed to keep the vehicle conveniently parked to allow a quick and orderly transport from the beach if the need should arise.

(c) (9) ORV Routes …. Review the table DESIGNATED ROUTES, understand what this will do to limit the access    to your traditionally, favorite areas whether they be for fishing, shelling, surfing, swimming or family             recreating area. Write what is in your heart, without anger but be explicit.

While the chart references ramps 2.5, 32.5, 47.5, 59.5 and several interdunal roads, no mention is made of how or when these routes will be constructed. Money is very slow coming from Washington (as evidenced in the recent end to the work On Bodie Island Lighthouse). Nothing should be closed unless or until these infrastructures are in place and usable. Parking areas must also be constructed to enable parking for all of the vehicles denied the right to park at favored areas.

VFA’s should not be permanently designated areas and only instituted when found necessary by the             Superintendent [ie, (10) Superintendent’s closures…..]. VFA’s (Vehicle Free Areas, a new term being                   used and implemented within this Proposed Rule) will require additional off beach parking for those                   who chose to be pedestrians within the VFA’s. If experience shows that VFA/s are not being regularly             used by a justifiable number of pedestrians these VFA’s could/should be reopened for ORV use.

This RULE should provide latitude to the Superintendent to adaptively alter designated routes, including the designation of new routes, to recognize the ever changing landscape of the beaches due to natural events and visitor use patterns.

ORV use during the village winter season…; the dates for winter season should not be fixed by the Rule but rather be cooperatively determined annually by the Superintendent, the NCDOT, Dare County officials and Hyde County officials.

(c) (12) Night Driving Restrictions. This is a restriction based on supposition rather than science and should not    be included. Never was there a reported incident of a turtle death, caused by a vehicle, until 2010 with night driving restrictions already in place.

File your comments via one of the following:

            DATES: The public comment period will be open for 60 days. Comments must be received on or before midnight (Eastern Daylight Time) on Tuesday, September 6, 2011. The NPS does not anticipate extending the public comment period beyond September 6 due to a court deadline for completing the final rule.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the Proposed Rule, identified by the Regulation Identifier Number: (RIN) 1024-AD85, by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments

Mail or hand deliver to: Superintendent, Cape Hatteras National Seashore,

1401 National Park Drive, Manteo , North Carolina 27954.

 Comments submitted through the Federal eRulemaking portal:

http://www.regulations.gov or submitted by mail must be entered or postmarked before midnight (Eastern Daylight Time) September 6, 2011.

Comments submitted by hand delivery must be received by the close of business hours (5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time) September 6, 2011.

Comments will not be accepted by fax, email, or in any way other than those specified above, and bulk comments in any format (hard copy or electronic) submitted on behalf of others will not be accepted.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: All submissions received must include the agency name, (National Park Service) and RIN for this rulemaking: 1024-AD85. All comments received through the Federal ERulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov will be available without change. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying information may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. To view comments received through the Federal eRulemaking portal, go to http://www.regulations.gov and enter “1024-AD85” in the “Keyword or ID” search box.

Sandy Schneirla

Cell (757) 739-8979

Tidewater Fourwheelers, Member

Virginia Four Wheel Drive Assoc, Vice President

Blue Ribbon Coalition, Member

United Four Wheel Drive Assoc, Member

NC Beach Buggy Assoc, Member

 
Logged

Auckland Four Wheel Drive Club Inc, 4x4 Challenges NZ Inc, NZFWDA life member
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
UFWDA Community Forum  |  Regional Focus - News and Local Events  |  Northeast  |  Topic: Comments to NPS @ Cape Hatteras National Seashore ORV PROPOSED RULE (RIN 1024-A « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!