Author Topic: New 'Wild Lands' policy blasted at congressional hearing  (Read 2324 times)

Offline Peter Vahry

  • UFWDA International Vice-President
  • Administrator
  • ghost
  • Posts: 1,476
New 'Wild Lands' policy blasted at congressional hearing
« on: March 02, 2011, 04:05:55 am »
New 'Wild Lands' policy blasted at congressional hearing
March 01, 2011

The U.S. Interior Department's new "Wild Lands" land-use policy was sharply criticized during a congressional hearing on March 1. The policy could close millions of acres of federal land to responsible motorized recreation.

Idaho Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter argued that, with the new policy, the Interior Department "has circumvented the sovereignty of states and the will of the public." Utah Gov. Gary Herbert said that "by bureaucratic fiat, one branch of government has overstepped and overreached and has devalued the rights of the states and the citizens." And Dennis Smith, a commissioner in Jackson County, Ore., said the Wild Lands policy "should be reversed in its entirety."

They joined several others in testifying before the House Committee on Natural Resources on "The Impact of the Administration's Wild Lands Order on Jobs and Economic Growth."

Robert Abbey, director of the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM), defended the Wild Lands policy, testifying that it "restores balance to the BLM's multiple-use management of the public lands in accordance with applicable law."

Courts have ruled that the BLM inventory of public land must include "inventory of wilderness values and that BLM must consider those values in its land-use planning," Abbey said.

For the full article please go to
Auckland Four Wheel Drive Club Inc, 4x4 Challenges NZ Inc, NZFWDA life member, Friends of 42 Traverse Inc.

Offline Keith Holman

  • Middle Atlantic Four Wheel Drive Association
  • ghost
  • Posts: 171
Re: New 'Wild Lands' policy blasted at congressional hearing
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2011, 03:18:26 pm »
It's sad that the current inability of our elected representatives to work for reasonable solutions to so many issues has contributed to this.
Congress is unable to deal and consider various implications of decisions. As a result, many pieces of "related" policies are shoved into an "omnibus" bill and whisked through to passage without sufficient (IMO) consideration. When they are unable to achieve a reasoned and well-considered policy, the agencies and bureaus take actions like this (where they usurp or bypass others who should have a voice).
Hasty decisions frequently are not good decisions.
Thi is just one example of bad policy arrived at when Congress failed to act and the agency went forward without due consideration.
What are you supposed to do when you see an "endangered" animal eating an "endangered" plant?
Middle Atlantic Four Wheel Drive Association